Vanguard’s recent decision to exclude spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) from its platform has raised concerns among some of its customers, leading them to consider alternative investment avenues.
The move comes as Vanguard emphasizes its commitment to traditional asset classes like equities, bonds, and cash, according to Investing Insider.
Vanguard officially stated that they will not offer spot Bitcoin ETFs for purchase on their platform and have no plans to introduce any Bitcoin or crypto-related products.
This decision is in line with their focus on conventional investment offerings, as they believe these assets are the foundation of a well-balanced, long-term investment portfolio.
Vanguard did not participate in the applications for spot Bitcoin ETFs in 2023, which has prompted investors to explore other platforms.
Tony Spencer, a Vanguard customer, claimed that the company informed him that they are not permitting the purchase of spot Bitcoin ETFs because it contradicts Vanguard’s investment philosophy.
Currently, Vanguard only allows investors to sell Grayscale’s flagship Bitcoin product, which was recently transformed into a spot ETF.
In response to Vanguard’s stance, some customers, including Coinbase’s senior engineering manager Yuga Cohler, are moving their funds to other platforms like Fidelity, which launched one of the ten spot Bitcoin ETFs on January 11.
Cohler expressed dissatisfaction with Vanguard’s decision, stating that it doesn’t align with his investment philosophy.
Neil Jacobs, a Bitcoin commentator, also voiced his disapproval and is in the process of transferring his funds out of Vanguard, describing the decision as a “terrible business decision.”
READ MORE: Congress Calls for Investigation into SEC Following Twitter Account Compromise
The Wall Street Journal reported that customers of investment firms such as Citi, Merrill Lynch, Edward Jones, and UBS faced similar restrictions on purchasing spot Bitcoin ETFs on their respective platforms.
Some of these firms are still evaluating their approach to these products.
UBS is reviewing unsolicited offers from prospective spot Bitcoin ETF investors on a case-by-case basis and is currently making the ETF available only for “aggressive investors.”
Not all approved spot Bitcoin ETFs are available on their platform.
Citi has made a spot Bitcoin ETF available for institutional clients and is considering its adoption for individual wealth clients.
Merrill Lynch is monitoring the efficiency of spot Bitcoin ETF trading before deciding to offer these products to their customers.
In contrast, JPMorgan’s brokerage platform allowed spot Bitcoin ETF trading, with JPMorgan being an authorized participant of BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF. However, JPMorgan disclosed potential risks to prospective investors considering these trades.
The first day of trading for spot Bitcoin ETFs, following regulatory approval, saw trading volumes exceeding 4.5 billion dollars, primarily driven by BlackRock, Grayscale, and Fidelity’s Bitcoin ETFs.
Additionally, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission approved applications from various ETF issuers, including ARK 21Shares, Invesco Galaxy, VanEck, WisdomTree, Valkyrie, Bitwise, and Franklin Templeton, with Hashdex awaiting S-1 approval.
Following the recent approval by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) of spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs), SEC Commissioner Mark Uyeda has expressed significant reservations regarding several aspects of the approval process.
While Uyeda voted in favor of the groundbreaking decision to approve these Bitcoin ETF applications, he voiced concerns about the underlying analytical approach adopted by the commission.
One of Uyeda’s primary concerns revolves around the potential long-term repercussions of the SEC’s reasoning in the approval order.
He worries that the flawed rationale and legal analysis employed in this case may serve as a precedent for future decisions, impacting the crypto industry for years to come.
Uyeda’s foremost objection centers on the SEC’s differentiation between Bitcoin and other commodities.
He believes that Bitcoin should be treated on par with other commodities and criticizes the commission’s use of the “significant size” test as a unique benchmark for spot Bitcoin ETP (exchange-traded product) applications.
According to Uyeda, spot Bitcoin ETPs should have been approved much earlier under this standard, and he questions why they continue to be treated differently than Bitcoin futures ETPs under the “significant market” test.
Although none of the Bitcoin ETF applicants met the SEC’s significant market test, the approval cited “other means” that satisfied the requirements.
Uyeda contends that the SEC’s decision to introduce a new standard after applicants spent years pursuing the significant market requirement was unjust.
He argues that the commission should have communicated its expectations more clearly to applicants, rather than forcing them to make multiple attempts with uncertain criteria.
Furthermore, Uyeda suspects that the SEC’s motivation for expediting the approval of spot Bitcoin ETFs was to gain a competitive advantage.
He points out a lack of analysis concerning how the cash-only creation and redemption feature might prevent fraudulent activities.
He emphasizes the importance of transparency in the analysis and reasoning behind approval orders.
In a somewhat contradictory stance, Uyeda ultimately supports the issuance of the approval order, despite his objections to the legal analysis presented in it.
He cites independent reasons for concluding that the applications met the approval standards outlined in the Exchange Act.
Nonetheless, his critique underscores the need for greater clarity, consistency, and fairness in the SEC’s approach to regulating cryptocurrency-related financial products.
The recent decision by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to approve the country’s first spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETF) has sent ripples of excitement through both the traditional finance (TradFi) and decentralized finance (DeFi) spaces.
This historic decision has sparked curiosity about its potential impact on the markets and, of course, on the price of Bitcoin itself.
Across the Atlantic in Europe, however, the excitement surrounding a Bitcoin ETF has already somewhat subsided. Europe witnessed the introduction of its first spot Bitcoin ETF on August 15, 2023.
The Jacobi FT Wilshire Bitcoin ETF made its debut on the Euronext Amsterdam stock exchange, more than a year after its originally planned launch.
This pioneering ETF was issued by Jacobi Asset Management, a London-based firm.
What set the Jacobi Bitcoin ETF apart was that it was the first physical-backed Bitcoin fund, offering investors exposure to a financial product backed by actual Bitcoin.
Moreover, it was classified as an “environmental investing” or Article 8 fund, promoting environmental and/or social characteristics.
Grzegorz Drozdz, a market analyst at the European Union-based financial services platform Conotoxia, discussed the market implications of U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs, particularly from a European perspective.
READ MORE: SEC Renews Warning on FOMO Crypto Investing Ahead of Expected Bitcoin ETF Approvals
He noted that the introduction of Bitcoin ETFs has significantly democratized access to the crypto market, moving beyond traditional cryptocurrency exchanges and wallets.
However, Drozdz pointed out that while Bitcoin ETFs are making waves, their size is still relatively small compared to the overall financial and crypto market.
The total capitalization of the cryptocurrency market stands at $1.78 trillion, and existing investment funds in this sector represent only 2.9% of this total value.
In the European Economic Area, there seems to be a greater openness to institutional investment in cryptocurrencies with the launch of Bitcoin ETFs.
However, Drozdz observed that these funds have not yet generated substantial inflows from institutions in Europe. Market expectations are currently more focused on the potential approval of such instruments in the U.S., which could have a more significant impact on the long-term development of the crypto world.
Despite the uncertainties, Drozdz emphasized the rapid increase in the inflow of new funds into the Bitcoin ETF space, which could potentially signal the start of a new bull market.
Given that Bitcoin still commands a substantial 53.7% share of the market’s capitalization, its success could have a significant ripple effect on the rest of the digital currency market.
This sentiment aligns with the speculations of other analysts and social media communities as they await the SEC’s decision on Bitcoin ETFs.
Bitcoin surged towards its recent high as Wall Street opened its doors on January 11th, as new U.S. macroeconomic data put inflation back on the radar. In the pre-market trading hours, Bitcoin’s price exhibited volatility, primarily hovering around $47,000.
The December Consumer Price Index (CPI) report defied expectations, revealing that inflation was accelerating faster than anticipated.
The month-on-month CPI showed a 0.3% increase, surpassing the expected 0.2%.
Furthermore, on a year-on-year basis, the index rose by 3.4%, exceeding the anticipated 3.2%, according to data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
This data confirmed a larger increase in the all-items index for the 12 months ending in December compared to November.
Although such reports usually trigger fluctuations in risk assets, this time they added to the already existing tension in the cryptocurrency markets.
On January 10th, the first U.S. spot Bitcoin exchange-traded fund (ETF) received approval, and its inaugural trading day was set for January 11th. Pre-market data indicated strong investor interest ahead of the ETF’s debut.
On that day, BTC/USD on Bitstamp briefly surpassed $47,700 but remained within its established range, with $48,000 acting as a resistance level.
READ MORE: SEC Renews Warning on FOMO Crypto Investing Ahead of Expected Bitcoin ETF Approvals
Prominent trader Jelle emphasized that shorting Bitcoin at this point was unwise, predicting an eventual upward acceleration.
Meanwhile, Ethereum outshone Bitcoin, with its 24-hour gains exceeding 10%.
This surge was attributed to traders shifting their focus to Ethereum after the ETF approval, as they didn’t witness the expected pump in Bitcoin’s price.
Crypto Tony, another trader, noted this shift in investor sentiment, driving ETH/USD to reach $2,666 on Bitstamp, its highest level since May 2022.
Other cryptocurrencies, such as Solana’s SOL and XRP, also posted double-digit gains.
In conclusion, Bitcoin’s price rallied as U.S. inflation data surprised investors, while the approval of the first U.S. Bitcoin ETF added to the cryptocurrency market’s anticipation.
Despite the volatility, Bitcoin remained within its established range, and Ethereum stole the spotlight with significant gains.
These developments illustrated the continued interest and resilience of the cryptocurrency market in the face of economic data and regulatory advancements.
Prominent lawyers and senators in the United States are urging Congress to launch an inquiry into the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) following a reported compromise of their Twitter account, previously known as X, which disseminated false news regarding the approval of spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs).
Senator Bill Hagerty expressed his dismay over the incident, drawing a parallel between the SEC’s accountability and that of public companies in case of a significant market-moving error.
Hagerty insisted that Congress should seek answers, deeming the situation unacceptable. Senator Cynthia Lummis also called for greater transparency from the SEC regarding the events leading to the erroneous post.
Charles Gasparino from Fox Business revealed that securities lawyers had informed him that the SEC would need to investigate itself for potential market manipulation. U.S. Representative Ann Wagner described the incident as “clear market manipulation” that adversely affected millions of investors, vowing to obtain more information from SEC Chair Gary Gensler.
Bloomberg ETF analyst James Seyffart speculated that Gensler would be displeased with the staff member responsible for the alleged security breach, foreseeing consequences for the individual involved.
Investment manager Timothy Peterson criticized the SEC, arguing that its security breach amounted to a potential market manipulation event, a violation of the commission’s core mission of safeguarding investors.
READ MORE: Mysterious Bitcoin Transaction: $64,000 Spent on Enigmatic 9MB Data Inscription
The incident in question, labeled as market manipulation, involved the SEC’s Twitter account, which falsely claimed the approval of spot Bitcoin ETFs.
X Safety, an account under the control of X, confirmed that the SEC’s account had been compromised due to an unidentified individual gaining control over a phone number linked to the SEC account through a third party.
Notably, the SEC’s X account lacked two-factor authentication at the time of the breach.
Layah Heilpern, a Bitcoin advocate, highlighted that the false post remained online for 20 minutes and garnered at least 4.4 million views during that period.
Heilpern asserted that this amounted to clear market manipulation.
The SEC has not provided detailed information on how their Twitter account was compromised but has denied the involvement of its staff in publishing the unauthorized tweet.
Despite the controversy, Bloomberg ETF analyst Eric Balchunas remains optimistic about the official approval of spot Bitcoin ETFs, expecting an announcement sometime between 4:00 pm to 5:00 pm Eastern Time on January 10.
Bitcoin is unlikely to experience an immediate bullish surge in response to the United States Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) potential approval of a spot Bitcoin exchange-traded fund (ETF), according to an analysis by trading firm QCP Capital.
Despite recent developments, Bitcoin’s price has displayed limited upside volatility.
The recent turmoil in the Bitcoin market was triggered by a hacker who falsely claimed on the SEC’s X (formerly Twitter) account that the first U.S. spot Bitcoin ETF had received official approval.
This incident was later revealed to be the result of a SIM swap attack, facilitated by the lack of two-factor authentication on the compromised account.
During this period of confusion and the subsequent correction by the SEC, the price of Bitcoin briefly approached $48,000 but failed to surpass that level.
QCP Capital interprets these events as a warning sign that even if the SEC grants official approval, it may not ignite the substantial rally that Bitcoin enthusiasts are anticipating.
READ MORE: Nebraska Legislature Proposes Bill to Establish Crypto Standards
The trading firm stated that the initial response to the fake “approval” was subdued, with Bitcoin unable to break free from its resistance level.
There remains a glimmer of hope for investors, as the deadline for approving one ETF application, submitted by ARK Invest, falls on January 10th.
Historically, the SEC has approved all ETFs simultaneously, so an announcement may be imminent.
$48,000 has become a pivotal price level for Bitcoin traders, with many considering it to be a local peak.
The future direction of Bitcoin’s price remains a topic of debate, with some foreseeing continued sideways movement, while more pessimistic predictions anticipate a substantial correction to as low as $35,000 or even $12,000.
At the time of writing, BTC/USD was trading near $45,600 ahead of the Wall Street opening on January 10th.
As the crypto market eagerly awaits the SEC’s decision, the uncertainty surrounding Bitcoin’s immediate future prevails.
Two U.S. Senators, J.D. Vance and Thom Tillis, have urged the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to provide a comprehensive report to Congress regarding the security breach that occurred on January 9 involving the SEC’s X Twitter account.
In a letter addressed to SEC Chair Gary Gensler on the same day as the incident, the senators expressed their grave concerns about the breach and its implications for the SEC’s internal cybersecurity protocols.
The senators emphasized that the breach was not only a matter of cybersecurity but also ran contrary to the SEC’s fundamental mission, which includes safeguarding investors, ensuring fair and efficient markets, and promoting capital formation.
They were particularly troubled by the “widespread confusion” caused by the hack, which prompted their request for a detailed report from the SEC to Congress.
The letter set a deadline of January 23 for the SEC to submit the report, drawing attention to an existing mandate that compels businesses to disclose the impact of any cybersecurity incident within four days.
The senators specifically asked whether the SEC could provide Congress with a report within this mandated timeframe if the breach was indeed a result of a cybersecurity attack, seeking an explanation if such a deadline couldn’t be met.
The breach, which occurred on January 9, involved the SEC’s X Twitter account posting a false tweet claiming that spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) had received approval in the United States.
READ MORE: SEC Chair Warns of Crypto Risks Amid Spot Bitcoin ETF Decision
The ensuing confusion in the cryptocurrency community was short-lived as Gensler later confirmed that the SEC’s X account had been compromised and the tweet unauthorized.
Critics, including investors and market participants, criticized the SEC for its lack of preparedness against cyberattacks and online threats.
An internal investigation by X, formerly Twitter, revealed that the SEC account did not have two-factor authentication enabled at the time of the breach.
The report from X also indicated that the breach occurred because an unidentified individual gained control over a phone number linked to the @SECGov account through a third party.
Several other prominent government officials, including Senators Cynthia Lummis and Bill Hagerty, as well as Representative Ann Wagner, echoed the concerns of their congressional colleagues.
Hagerty demanded full transparency regarding the incident, while Lummis emphasized the risks associated with fraudulent announcements that can manipulate financial markets, calling for clarity on such incidents.
These collective concerns highlight the urgent need for a comprehensive report from the SEC to address the security breach and its broader implications.
Bitcoin is on the verge of a potentially historic week, with the crypto market anxiously awaiting the approval of a spot Bitcoin exchange-traded fund (ETF) in the United States.
The belief is that such approval could trigger the next crypto bull market and drive widespread crypto adoption.
Several companies hoping to launch spot Bitcoin ETFs have submitted their latest Form S-1 amendments on January 8, increasing the anticipation.
Analysts and observers are predicting that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) may grant approval for the first spot Bitcoin ETF around January 9 or 10.
Bloomberg’s Senior ETF analyst, Eric Balchunas, is notably confident that there is a 90% chance of approval.
Regardless of the outcome, the crypto markets are expected to experience significant turbulence.
The entry of giants like BlackRock and Fidelity, with trillions of dollars in assets under management, into the Bitcoin ETF market may alter the dynamics of companies like Coinbase and MicroStrategy.
MicroStrategy, in particular, could face challenges as a spot Bitcoin ETF could open doors for traditional investors to enter the crypto market, potentially affecting Bitcoin proxies like MSTR.
MicroStrategy has been accumulating Bitcoin as a hedge against inflation and currently holds a substantial amount, making it a popular choice for investors looking to indirectly invest in Bitcoin through the stock market.
However, with the approval of a spot Bitcoin ETF, MicroStrategy may lose its status as the go-to Bitcoin proxy for traditional investors.
READ MORE: Nonfiction Authors Sue OpenAI and Microsoft for Copyright Infringement in Latest Legal Battle
Spencer Bogart, a fundamental analyst, suggests that while the ETF approval could raise MicroStrategy’s stock price due to its Bitcoin exposure, it might also impact the stock’s premium compared to the actual value of Bitcoin it holds.
A spot Bitcoin ETF has the potential to drive crypto adoption by providing a bridge between traditional and crypto markets, attracting Wall Street capital.
This influx of capital could also benefit MicroStrategy by creating buying pressure on its stock.
Investors considering MicroStrategy over a Bitcoin ETF should weigh the fact that they won’t need to pay a management fee, unlike ETFs.
Additionally, MicroStrategy is a thriving business with a diverse portfolio and a strong financial position related to its Bitcoin investments.
Coinbase, on the other hand, has positioned itself as a custodian for various Bitcoin ETFs, including those from BlackRock, VanEck, and Grayscale.
This move could significantly boost Coinbase’s revenue and attract more traditional investment sector players to use its custodial services.
However, there are potential challenges for Coinbase, including a pending SEC case related to its staking-as-a-service program, which could impact its stock price.
In the midst of all this, Bitcoin’s price remains highly sensitive to the SEC’s decision regarding the spot Bitcoin ETF.
The recent 7% price drop on January 3, following hints of a potential SEC rejection, underscores the volatility of the cryptocurrency and the market’s dependence on regulatory decisions.
Core Scientific, a Bitcoin mining company, has successfully closed a $55-million equity financing round, marking a significant milestone in its journey back to financial stability.
The announcement, made on January 8th, revealed that the equity offering, which had expired the previous week, was met with overwhelming demand, resulting in oversubscription.
Core Scientific’s CEO, Adam Sullivan, expressed his satisfaction with the outcome, stating that this successful funding round, combined with the full repayment of previously drawn amounts from their debtor-in-possession (DIP) financing, positions the company to exit Chapter 11 bankruptcy in January with strengthened liquidity and a robust foundation for future growth.
As of its most recent financial statement dated November 2023, Core Scientific reported $2.3 billion in assets and $559 million in liabilities, culminating in total equity of $1.8 billion.
The company has outlined its intention to relist on the Nasdaq exchange once the bankruptcy proceedings have been fully resolved.
On January 4th, Core Scientific took a significant step towards recovery by announcing the complete repayment of its outstanding DIP balance, which had been provided by its lender, B. Riley Financial.
READ MORE: Nebraska Legislature Proposes Bill to Establish Crypto Standards
Importantly, the company still retains access to the remaining $35 million in funding under the DIP agreement.
Core Scientific’s journey to solvency was prompted by various challenges, including the crypto market downturn, escalating energy costs, heightened mining difficulty, and the burden of bad debt stemming from loans to crypto firm Celsius.
Under its restructuring plan, the company is set to emerge from bankruptcy with $709 million in net debt and $791 million in shareholder equity.
Core Scientific’s shareholders are slated to receive new shares, offered at a ratio of 25:1, effectively providing them with $1.08 per pre-exchange share.
Notably, noteholders will also benefit from the restructuring, receiving $1.628 for each $1 face value of convertible notes due in April and $1.201 per $1 face value for notes with an August due date.
This successful equity financing round and debt repayment demonstrate Core Scientific’s commitment to its recovery strategy, positioning it for a strong comeback in the cryptocurrency mining industry.
Despite a recent hack of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) social media account, the regulatory body is expected to proceed with its decision on approving spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) this week.
On January 9th, the SEC’s Twitter account, known as the “X account,” was compromised, leading to an unauthorized post claiming that spot Bitcoin ETFs had been approved in the United States.
Although the message was removed approximately 20 minutes later, it caused significant disruption on social media and in the financial markets.
The SEC has reported that it is cooperating with law enforcement agencies to investigate the incident thoroughly.
Some observers have expressed concerns that this incident might be exploited as an excuse to delay the decision beyond the anticipated deadline of January 10th.
However, many consider this to be a remote possibility. Dennis Porter, CEO of Satoshi Action Fund, suggested that the SEC’s intentions would determine whether they might use this event to slow down the ETF approval process.
Porter remains optimistic that the SEC will grant approval to the spot Bitcoin ETF applicants on January 10th.
He stated that information from his contacts suggests that the ETF could be approved as early as this week or even as soon as tomorrow.
READ MORE: Bitcoin ETF Race Heats Up as Leading Players File Final Amendments with SEC
U.S. attorney and commercial litigator Joe Carlasare also believes that the SEC is likely to make a decision by the January 10th deadline.
He considers it extremely unlikely that the incident would lead the SEC to delay the approval or rejection of the ETFs.
However, Mati Greenspan, from cryptocurrency-focused finance firm Quantum Economics, raised the possibility that the SEC might attempt to use the false post as a pretext for a delay.
He mentioned that regulatory agencies have used various tactics to influence the markets in the past.
Bloomberg ETF analyst Eric Balchunas remains optimistic, anticipating the official approval of spot Bitcoin ETFs sometime between 4:00 pm and 5:00 pm Eastern Time on January 10th.
Digital asset lawyer Anthony Tu-Sekine of Seward and Kissel expressed skepticism that the incident would impact the likelihood of approvals at this late stage.
He found it puzzling that someone would engage in such actions when approval was already widely anticipated.