Robinhood, the popular trading platform, announced its second-quarter results, marking a significant achievement of turning profitable for the first time since going public.
Despite a decline in revenue during the second quarter of 2023, the company managed to report a net income of $25 million and earnings per share (EPS) of $0.03.
This is in stark contrast to the first quarter of the year when they had incurred a net loss of $511 million and an EPS of -$0.57.
The drop in revenue was notable in several transaction-based sources. Revenue from cryptocurrency transactions decreased by 18% to $31 million, while options and equities revenue also witnessed declines of 5% to $127 million and 7% to $25 million, respectively.
Over the past year, the company’s revenue has experienced an overall decrease of 4%, going from $202 million in June of the previous year to $193 million.
Despite the revenue dip, Robinhood managed to improve its total operating expenses, leading to its profitable Q2 results.
The earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) saw a remarkable 31% sequential increase, reaching $151 million, with a corresponding margin gain of five percentage points, reaching 31%.
EBITDA is a crucial metric used by analysts and investors to gauge a company’s operational performance within its industry.
READ MORE: U.S. Judge Denies Motion to Dismiss SEC Lawsuit Against Terraform Labs
Robinhood’s total assets under custody experienced a 13% growth, reaching $89 billion in the last quarter. The increase was attributed to higher equity valuations and consistent net deposits.
Moreover, the company showed promising progress in its crypto assets under custody, which grew from $8.431 billion in December 2022 to $11.503 billion in June 2023.
Vlad Tenev, the CEO and co-founder of Robinhood Markets, expressed his satisfaction with the achievement, stating, “In Q2, we reached a significant milestone by achieving GAAP profitability for the first time as a public company.”
GAAP stands for Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, representing standard accounting principles and guidelines used by companies for financial reporting.
The report revealed that Robinhood’s net deposit for the quarter amounted to $4.1 billion, reflecting an annualized growth rate of 21% concerning assets under custody in Q1 2023.
Additionally, the net deposits over the past 12 months amounted to $16.1 billion, indicating a growth rate of 25% over the course of a year.
Overall, despite the drop in revenue from certain transactions, Robinhood’s second-quarter results marked a significant turning point, as they successfully achieved profitability and demonstrated positive growth trends in various aspects of their business operations.
Other Stories:
Decentralized Exchange on Coinbase’s Base Network Pauses Trading Amidst Concerns of Exploit
Binance CEO CZ Unveils Plan to Launch Smaller Algorithmic Stablecoins
IRS Issues New Ruling: U.S. Crypto Investors Must Report Staking Rewards as Gross Income
The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is moving forward with its lawsuit against Terraform Labs, as a U.S. judge overseeing the case denied the firm’s motion to dismiss on July 31.
This legal battle began on February 16 when the SEC filed a suit against Terraform Labs and its founder, Do Kwon, accusing them of orchestrating a multi-billion dollar crypto asset securities fraud.
Terraform Labs’ legal representatives tried to have the case dismissed in April, followed by additional materials supporting their motion in June.
Judge Jed Rakoff of the Southern District Court of New York reviewed the arguments and found that, for the purpose of this motion, all well-pleaded allegations must be taken as true, and all reasonable inferences must be drawn in favor of the SEC.
Terraform Labs had argued that the SEC lacked jurisdiction over the company and its founder.
They also contested the agency’s classification of tokens like Mirror Protocol (MIR), Terra Classic (LUNC), and TerraUSD Classic (USTC) as securities.
Terraform Labs further suggested that the SEC should wait for Congressional action on crypto regulation.
However, Judge Rakoff rejected the claim that the SEC lacked the authority to regulate crypto tokens without Congressional authorization.
READ MORE: Liquid Staking Tokens Poised to Dethrone Ethereum’s Ether (ETH) as Dominant DeFi Asset
He also disagreed with Terraform Labs’ reliance on the “Major Questions Doctrine.”
The judge extensively analyzed the Howey test, an important legal framework for determining whether an asset qualifies as a security.
He emphasized that no formal contract is necessary to meet the Howey test, and tokens themselves may be considered securities in court arguments.
Furthermore, Judge Rakoff rejected the idea of distinguishing between tokens like MIR and LUNA based on their manner of sale.
This rejection contrasts with a similar case involving Ripple Labs Inc., where another judge had drawn such a distinction.
The Ripple case involved the SEC’s claim that XRP was not a security when sold on the secondary market, which was partially accepted, providing Ripple with a partial win.
With Judge Rakoff’s ruling, the SEC’s case against Terraform Labs continues, indicating that the court is not following the same approach as in the Ripple case.
This ruling might have implications for future cases involving crypto assets and could set a precedent for the SEC’s regulation of the crypto industry.
Other Stories:
SEC Chairman Gary Gensler Raises Alarm Over Widespread Fraud in Crypto Market
BNB Smart Chain (BSC) Hit by Copycat Attacks
Bitcoin’s Reduced Volatility Sparks Anticipation for Exciting Long-Term Bull Signal
The cryptocurrency market experienced its most challenging month in 2023, as revealed by a report from Web3 outlet De.Fi, shared with Cointelegraph.
Losses in July amounted to a staggering $486 million, surpassing the total losses from the entire year of 2022 by more than six times.
This alarming trend followed a series of high-profile hacks and exploits that occurred during the month, accompanied by a flurry of legislative activity surrounding the regulation of cryptocurrency and digital assets.
Unfortunately, the recovery efforts for the stolen funds proved insufficient, with only $6.15 million, representing a mere 1% of the total stolen amount, successfully reclaimed.
Researchers at De.Fi expressed their concern over the lack of effective measures to quickly recover lost funds.
They emphasized the critical role played by the cryptocurrency sector in recuperating stolen or lost assets, stating that it is vital in mitigating the adverse effects of such unfortunate incidents.
The report highlighted that the majority of the losses originated from the Ethereum network, accounting for $447 million lost across 36 cases.
Notable incidents included the Multichain hack, which resulted in $231 million in losses, and the Alphapo exploit, causing approximately $100 million in damages.
Following Ethereum, the network with the next highest losses was Base, where a single case led to $23 million being lost.
Binance took third place, reporting a loss of nearly $11 million across 18 cases.
READ MORE: BNB Smart Chain (BSC) Hit by Copycat Attacks
The report attributed the primary cause of the losses in July to “access control issues,” accounting for a significant portion of the funds lost at $364 million.
Additionally, there were over 38 reported cases of “rugpulls,” resulting in approximately $36 million in losses, and reentrancy attacks led to around $78 million in damages.
Despite the concerning statistics, there was a glimmer of positive news in the report:
July saw no reports of exit scams, providing a ray of hope amidst the otherwise bleak scenario.
The De.Fi team’s report underscored the urgency for improved security measures, regulatory efforts, and robust recovery strategies within the cryptocurrency space.
Without prompt and effective action, the market’s vulnerability to hacks and exploits may continue to exacerbate losses and hinder its overall growth and stability.
Other Stories:
Liquid Staking Tokens Poised to Dethrone Ethereum’s Ether (ETH) as Dominant DeFi Asset
SEC Chairman Gary Gensler Raises Alarm Over Widespread Fraud in Crypto Market
Bitcoin’s Reduced Volatility Sparks Anticipation for Exciting Long-Term Bull Signal
Curve Finance, the decentralized finance (DeFi) protocol, is facing another challenge in addition to recovering from a recent $47-million hack. Concerns have arisen among holders of the protocol’s token regarding a potential massive dump.
On August 1, Delphi Digital, a crypto research firm, revealed in a Twitter thread that Curve Finance founder Michael Egorov had taken loans backed by a significant portion of the circulating supply of Curve DAO (CRV).
These loans amount to around $100 million and are secured by 427.5 million CRV tokens.
One of the loans, on Aave, involves 305 million CRV supporting a 63.2-million Tether (USDT) loan.
Delphi Digital noted that if the CRV token’s price were to drop by 36%, the position could be liquidated at $0.3767, which is below the current trading price of CRV at approximately $0.5975.
On Frax Finance, Egorov holds 59 million CRV supporting a debt of 15.8 million Frax (FRAX).
The loan carries additional risks due to Fraxlend’s time-weighted variable interest rate, which doubles every 12 hours when the loan is at 100% utilization.
The interest rate can reach an alarming 10,000% in just 3.5 days, making liquidation a possibility regardless of the CRV token’s price.
To mitigate these risks, Egorov has been working to reduce the debt and utilization rate by paying 4 million FRAX in the last 24 hours.
However, users have been quick to withdraw their liquidity as soon as Egorov makes payments.
READ MORE: BNB Smart Chain (BSC) Hit by Copycat Attacks
To address this liquidity issue, Egorov implemented a Curve pool to incentivize liquidity in the lending market.
Within four hours of its launch, the pool attracted $2 million in liquidity and decreased the utilization rate from 100% to 89%.
The situation has drawn comparisons to FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried using FTX Token (FTT) as collateral and raised concerns within the community, with some fearing that it could hinder the DeFi industry’s progress and discourage potential investors.
Cointelegraph attempted to reach out to Egorov for comment, but there was no immediate response.
In summary, Curve Finance’s CRV token holders are now facing worries about a potential massive token dump due to the significant loans taken by the protocol’s founder, backed by a substantial amount of CRV tokens.
Efforts are being made to manage the risks, but the situation has drawn attention and concern from the crypto community.
Other Stories:
2023 Ranking: 4 Best Crypto Projects To Buy
SEC Chairman Gary Gensler Raises Alarm Over Widespread Fraud in Crypto Market
Liquid Staking Tokens Poised to Dethrone Ethereum’s Ether (ETH) as Dominant DeFi Asset
A zero transfer phishing attack recently orchestrated by a scammer resulted in the theft of $20 million worth of Tether (USDT) on August 1.
The incident unfolded when the scammer managed to get hold of 20 million USDT from the victim’s address, which was identified as 0x4071…9Cbc.
The victim intended to send the money to address 0xa7B4BAC8f0f9692e56750aEFB5f6cB5516E90570, but due to the scammer’s cunning manipulation, it was redirected to a phishing address, 0xa7Bf48749D2E4aA29e3209879956b9bAa9E90570.
The scammer’s ploy started with the victim’s wallet receiving $10 million from a Binance account. After sending it to another address, the victim unknowingly fell prey to the scammer’s trickery.
The scammer initiated a fabricated Zero USDT token transfer from the victim’s account to the phishing address.
When the victim later attempted to transfer 20 million USDT, they mistakenly believed they were sending it to their desired address.
However, they were, in fact, transferring the amount to the scammer.
Upon discovering the scam, Tether promptly blacklisted the victim’s wallet, raising concerns about the swiftness of the issuer’s response.
READ MORE: Liquid Staking Tokens Poised to Dethrone Ethereum’s Ether (ETH) as Dominant DeFi Asset
The success of this type of phishing attack is partially attributed to the common practice among users of only checking the first or last five digits of a wallet address, rather than verifying the entire address. This oversight causes them to send assets to a phishing address unknowingly.
The mechanics of the zero transfer scam can be explained as follows: When a victim sends a certain amount of coins to an address for an exchange deposit, the attacker duplicates a similar-looking address under their control.
They then execute a transaction for zero coins from the victim’s wallet to this mimic address.
When the victim reviews their transaction history, they might mistake the phishing address for the actual deposit address and proceed to send their coins to it.
Unfortunately, such zero transfer phishing scams have become increasingly common within the cryptocurrency ecosystem over the past year.
In fact, the first known instance of this type of scam occurred in December 2022, and it has since caused losses exceeding $40 million due to various reported attacks.
In conclusion, the prevalence of zero transfer phishing attacks highlights the need for increased vigilance and awareness among cryptocurrency users.
By verifying complete wallet addresses and staying informed about emerging scam techniques, users can better protect their digital assets from falling into the hands of malicious actors.
Additionally, issuers and platforms within the crypto industry should continue to develop robust security measures to mitigate the impact of these scams and safeguard their users’ funds.
Other Stories:
BNB Smart Chain (BSC) Hit by Copycat Attacks
Bitcoin’s Reduced Volatility Sparks Anticipation for Exciting Long-Term Bull Signal
SEC Chairman Gary Gensler Raises Alarm Over Widespread Fraud in Crypto Market
The BNB Smart Chain (BSC) recently experienced copycat attacks due to a vulnerability in the Vyper programming language, similar to the exploit faced by the decentralized finance (DeFi) protocol Curve Finance.
Blockchain security firm BlockSec reported on July 30 that approximately $73,000 worth of cryptocurrencies on BSC were stolen across three separate exploits.
The exploitation of liquidity pools on Curve Finance also led to significant losses, surpassing $41 million, as estimated by BlockSec.
The root cause of the vulnerability was identified as a malfunctioning reentrancy lock in Vyper versions 0.2.15, 0.2.16, and 0.3.0, which are widely used by various DeFi pools.
Since Vyper is designed for the Ethereum Virtual Machine, it is plausible that other protocols utilizing these versions might also be affected, emphasizing the need for secure BSC RPC configurations to mitigate risks.
Following the news of the exploit, both white hat and black hat hackers engaged in on-chain activities, attempting to thwart each other’s exploit attempts or recover funds.
One individual, known as “c0ffebabe.eth,” seemed to act as a potential white hat and secured some funds for safekeeping.
READ MORE: Worldcoin’s Iris Scanning Project Raises Privacy and Sovereignty Concern
On July 30, this individual issued an on-chain message requesting affected protocols to contact them in order to arrange the return of funds.
To date, “c0ffebabe.eth” has returned nearly 2,900 Ether (ETH), equivalent to approximately $5 million, to Curve in one transaction.
Another transaction saw them moving 1,000 ETH to a seemingly newly-created wallet, likely the cold wallet mentioned earlier for additional safekeeping.
The situation has raised concerns about the security of Vyper and its implications for other Web3 projects.
Given the wide adoption of this programming language, it is crucial for developers and protocols to be vigilant about potential vulnerabilities and promptly address them to protect user funds.
In conclusion, the BNB Smart Chain faced copycat attacks due to a Vyper programming language vulnerability, echoing the exploit witnessed on the Curve Finance DeFi protocol.
The incident has underscored the importance of robust security measures in the rapidly evolving landscape of decentralized finance and serves as a reminder for projects to prioritize the safety of their users’ assets.
Other Stories:
Kyrgyzstan Expands Cryptocurrency Mining with Government Backing at Hydro Power Plant
French Data Protection Agency Investigates Worldcoin
Pro-XRP Lawyer Alleges SEC’s Actions Driven by Safeguarding Corporate Capitalism
Heartland Tri-State Bank of Elkhart, part of the ongoing crisis in the U.S. banking system, was closed on July 29 by the Kansas Office of the State Bank Commissioner, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) took control.
The FDIC stated that on July 31, the bank’s four branches would reopen as branches of Dream First Bank during regular business hours.
Depositors of the failed bank would become customers of Dream First Bank, and all transactions, including withdrawals, deposits, and loans, would be processed through the acquiring bank.
Customers were advised to use their existing branch location until the transition was complete.
This collapse marked the second bank crisis of the week, following the merger of PacWest and Banc of California on July 25, as both institutions attempted to stabilize amid the turmoil in the banking industry.
Rising U.S. interest rates and poor risk management were believed to be the primary reasons behind the bank’s failure, alongside the inflation surge.
READ MORE:Revealed: The Best Crypto Marketing & PR Agency
The U.S. Federal Reserve had raised its benchmark rate to 5.25% in July, the highest rate since 2007, in an attempt to tackle inflation, which reached 4.1% year-over-year in June.
As of March, Heartland Tri-State Bank held approximately $139 million in total assets and $130 million in total deposits.
Dream First Bank agreed to purchase all the assets of the failed bank, with the FDIC estimating that the cost to the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF) would be $54.2 million.
The DIF, created in 1933 by Congress and managed by the FDIC, aims to protect deposits in the nation’s banks.
The FDIC noted that Dream First Bank’s acquisition was the least costly resolution for the DIF compared to other alternatives.
In response to the recent failures at major banks, Democrats in the House Financial Services Committee introduced several bills in June aimed at strengthening the safety and soundness of the banking system and enhancing bank executive accountability.
Representative Maxine Waters emphasized that Congress must take action to address these failures promptly.
The collapse of Heartland Tri-State Bank follows the troubled First Republic Bank’s acquisition by JPMorgan in May and the dramatic collapse of Silicon Valley Bank in March, both of which had caused significant disruptions in the U.S. banking system.
These events underscore the urgency of addressing the challenges faced by financial institutions and the need for measures to stabilize the banking sector.
Other Stories:
Why Didn’t Bitcoin (BTC) Enter a New Rally?
SEC and Binance Oppose Eeon’s Intervention in Crypto Exchange Lawsuit
3 Best Crypto Projects That Will Boom In 2023 & The Next Bull Run
Margot Robbie, the well-known Australian actress starring in the lead role of the upcoming Barbie movie, has sparked a lively discussion within the crypto community with her recent statement comparing Bitcoin (BTC) to Barbie’s companion, Ken.
During an interview with Fandango on June 22, Robbie shared that whenever she overheard her husband, Tom Ackerley, and television producer, David Heyman, discussing Bitcoin on set, it reminded her of the traits of Ken, the fictional character played by Ryan Gosling in Barbie.
The crypto community on Twitter, including figures like Michael Saylor from MicroStrategy and social media influencer Layah Heilpern, had a mixed response to Robbie’s analogy.
Saylor even declared Bitcoin to be synonymous with “Big Ken Energy,” while others, like Layah Heilpern, saw it as an insult towards men who talk about Bitcoin.
On July 30, Heilpern further explained her interpretation of Robbie’s remarks, suggesting that the actress implied male Bitcoin enthusiasts are weak and pathetic.
However, Mark Travers, a lead psychologist at Awake Therapy, countered this perspective, stating that having Ken’s energy could indicate someone who is selfless and adaptable, challenging traditional gender stereotypes.
Robbie herself acknowledged that defining Ken energy might be subjective, stating that it’s something one can sense rather than precisely define.
READ MORE:Revealed: The Best Crypto Marketing & PR Agency
Despite differing opinions, Steven Lubka, a managing director at Swan Bitcoin, viewed Robbie’s comment as positive for the crypto community, expressing optimism on July 29.
It is worth noting that Robbie’s comments were brief and neutral, taking place amidst ongoing legal actions against celebrities who have promoted cryptocurrencies.
NBA star Jimmy Butler, for instance, sought to be removed from a class-action lawsuit alleging the promotion of unregistered securities by cryptocurrency exchange Binance.
In a filing on July 24, Butler’s lawyers argued that the tweets he appeared in did not promote the named securities and, therefore, could not have contributed to their promotion.
Binance CEO Changpeng “CZ” Zhao and YouTubers Ben Armstrong (BitBoy Crypto) and Graham Stephan are also contesting similar allegations in the same lawsuit.
In conclusion, Margot Robbie’s comparison of Bitcoin to Ken from Barbie sparked a lively debate within the crypto community.
While some embraced the analogy as a positive representation, others interpreted it as demeaning. As discussions continue, it’s evident that the crypto world remains dynamic and subject to ongoing scrutiny.
Other Stories:
Why Didn’t Bitcoin (BTC) Enter a New Rally?
3 Best Crypto Projects That Will Boom In 2023 & The Next Bull Run
SEC and Binance Oppose Eeon’s Intervention in Crypto Exchange Lawsuit
We have evaluated dozens of crypto and blockchain marketing agencies, to reveal which one is best when it comes to fees, results and other factors.
This review covers the full span of services offered by crypto marketing agencies, including public relations (PR), social media management, SEO, content writing, digital marketing, and reputation management.
Which Crypto Marketing Agency is the Best?
We have concluded that Imperium Comms is the best crypto and blockchain marketing agency.
They offer a full suite of marketing services for projects in the cryptocurrency, Web 3.0 and tech space, including:
- Organic media coverage in sites such as Bloomberg, Coindesk and Cointelegraph
- Crypto Press Release distribution to hundreds of leading news sites
- Content writing and digital marketing
- Search engine optimization (SEO)
- Specialized promotions for ICOs and NFTs drops
Their packages start at just $599, and they are the most affordable crypto marketing agency in the market.
Why Are Crypto & Blockchain Marketing Agencies Important?
In the modern world where technology is in constant evolution, crypto and blockchain have quickly emerged as dominant forces. As with any new industry, the need for specialized marketing services is immediate and urgent. Enter crypto and blockchain marketing agencies, a new breed of companies tailoring their marketing strategies to these specific niches.
These agencies blend deep industry knowledge with cutting-edge marketing practices, aiming to help cryptocurrency and blockchain-based companies grow and prosper.
Understanding the complexity of the crypto and blockchain landscape is vital for these agencies. Cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology are more than just buzzwords; they’re multifaceted concepts encapsulating multiple disciplines like finance, technology, and law.
Agencies dedicated to crypto and blockchain marketing need a thorough understanding of these areas, along with expertise in digital marketing strategies, to effectively promote their clients’ brands.
The field of blockchain and crypto marketing is a relatively new and rapidly evolving discipline. It’s characterized by its focus on both crypto-specific techniques like token marketing, community management, and blockchain PR, as well as more traditional digital marketing strategies like SEO, social media marketing, and content creation.
ICOs, IEOs & STOs
Token marketing is an integral part of many agencies’ strategies. Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs), Initial Exchange Offerings (IEOs), and Security Token Offerings (STOs) are key means of raising funds for crypto and blockchain projects.
Therefore, these agencies must master the art of promoting tokens to potential investors. They need to clearly communicate the token’s value proposition, align it with the overall project vision, and follow all necessary legal protocols.
Community management is another pivotal area for crypto and blockchain marketing. Communities form the backbone of many projects, providing support, spreading awareness, and often playing a significant role in the project’s governance. Effective agencies can help nurture these communities, fostering engagement and dialogue through various platforms like Discord, Telegram, and social media networks.
How to Effectively Promote a Blockchain Project
The significance of public relations (PR) in blockchain marketing cannot be overstated. Given the complexity and novelty of blockchain technology, agencies must be able to effectively communicate the advantages of their clients’ products or services to the media, investors, and the public. Through PR efforts, they aim to increase brand visibility, manage reputation, and build credibility within the industry.
However, crypto and blockchain marketing agencies don’t only rely on industry-specific tactics. They also employ traditional digital marketing strategies tailored to the specific needs of the blockchain sector. SEO, for instance, is used to improve the visibility of blockchain companies on search engines, making it easier for potential investors and users to find them.
Agencies employ techniques such as keyword optimization, link building, and creating high-quality content to achieve this.
Content marketing is another core strategy. Agencies create engaging content about their clients’ products or services, educating potential users about the benefits of blockchain technology and cryptocurrencies. This can take the form of blog posts, whitepapers, case studies, videos, infographics, and more. The goal is to build trust and establish the client as a thought leader in the blockchain space.
Social media marketing is also utilized to reach a broader audience. Platforms like Twitter, LinkedIn, Reddit, and Facebook are used to engage with the community, share news, promote events, and more. Given the global nature of the crypto industry, social media plays a vital role in connecting with a geographically dispersed audience.
It’s worth noting that marketing in the crypto and blockchain industry comes with its unique set of challenges. These include the industry’s inherent volatility, regulatory complexities, public skepticism, and the technical nature of the subject.
Crypto and blockchain marketing agencies need to navigate these challenges skillfully, ensuring their clients’ brands resonate with the target audience while adhering to all relevant regulations and guidelines.
Despite these challenges, the opportunity for growth in the crypto and blockchain sector is immense. The industry continues to expand at an unprecedented rate, with an ever-increasing number of businesses leveraging these technologies for various applications.
Final Thoughts
Crypto and blockchain marketing agencies have an essential role to play in this exciting growth story, helping firms in this space reach their potential and make a significant impact.
Crypto and blockchain marketing agencies are the need of the hour in this rapidly expanding industry. Their blend of industry-specific knowledge and marketing expertise is critical in helping companies navigate the intricate landscape of the blockchain world.
By utilizing a mix of crypto-specific techniques and traditional marketing strategies, these agencies can effectively promote their clients, fostering growth and driving success in the fascinating world of crypto and blockchain.
Bitcoin (BTC) remained relatively stable with a ticker down at $29,311 during the Wall Street open on July 28, despite the release of United States inflation data that surpassed expectations.
However, the data on the Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) Index, which is considered the Federal Reserve’s preferred metric for inflation, indicated that U.S. inflation was continuing to decrease.
This development led financial analysts, such as The Kobeissi Letter, to speculate that the Fed might finally have inflation under control, as PCE inflation was at its lowest since April 2021.
Despite the significant economic indicators, Bitcoin’s price action saw only a modest boost and did not display significant volatility. Instead, it remained within a range of $29,000 to $29,500.
Traders’ sentiment suggested that there was still a preference for the downside, as the resistance target of $30,000 had been holding for over a week.
Notably, popular trader Crypto Tony expressed his anticipation for BTC to continue moving down to $28,000, although he acknowledged the possibility of a brief consolidation phase before the drop.
Fellow trader Daan Crypto Trades also emphasized the loss of the local range centered around the $30,000 level and suggested preparing for a potential drop to the low $28Ks.
READ MORE: Former Twitter Product Director Exposes Peculiarities of Working Under Elon Musk
However, he cautioned that if BTC managed to retake the $29.5K level, the bearish scenario could be invalidated.
On the other hand, Michaël van de Poppe, the founder and CEO of trading firm Eight, identified a “deviation” on the daily BTC/USD chart, similar to a previous occurrence in February, which was followed by an upward rebound.
He also questioned whether the weekend’s thinner liquidity and increased potential for volatile movements could trigger a “classic” comeback for Bitcoin.
In conclusion, despite the release of positive U.S. inflation data, Bitcoin’s price remained relatively stable and did not show significant volatility.
Traders’ sentiment suggested a preference for the downside, with the $30,000 resistance level still holding.
However, some analysts remained cautious about the potential for a bullish rebound based on technical indicators and historical patterns.
As the weekend approached, market participants kept a close eye on the potential for increased volatility in the cryptocurrency market.
Other Stories:
Crypto.com Receives Approval from Dutch Central Bank
Crypto Mining Firm Explores Initial Public Offering (IPO) in UAE